There is so much controversy around the Kavanaugh/Blasey-Ford debacle, and so many opinions,
and even so much contradictory “facts”, that I wanted some clarity on what was really
happening. Since creating the tool of Neimology® Science, the ability to know someone’s
personality predispositions by interpreting the placement of the letters in a name, that is used
by HR departments when hiring, lawyers to be able to stack the deck in their favor when
presenting a case, and individuals who wish to know their life’s blueprint, I decided to utilize
analyzing the names to delve into this case.

Proponents of Brett Kavanaugh state his being framed and he’s actually a great guy who would
never do what was claimed that he did. Conversely, proponents of Christine Blasey-Ford state
that she remembers the important parts of the what she stated happened combined with her
emotional status, that she must be telling the truth about her experiences.
Each person is being convinced to choose a side depending on what your source of information
is. For those listening to mainstream media that excels on hitting on all of our emotions, you’d
easily side with Blasey-Ford as these information outlets claim Kavanaugh did frequently get
drunk at school and was quite aggressive when drunk. However, if you are listening to
alternative news that supposedly is more fact based, then you’d easily side with Kavanaugh as
they claim friends of Kavanaugh have supported his claims indicating not one of them
remember him ever being inappropriate or even being at a party where Blasey-Ford was present.
Both sides state that their friends support their views. Both sides state the other side is lying.
Both sides have indicated that they are the innocent party being unfairly accused by the other
one. So, who is telling the truth? Let’s see if their names give us any clues on who is actually
telling the truth.

Kavanaugh’s name indicates that he’ll be excellent in whatever he does. He is highly
competitive and would excel in multiple areas. He is a detective and wants to get to the bottom
of whatever is happening around him. He is a good listener, so his friends dump their problems
on him because they know they’ll be given great advise. He is so competitive that he’d rise to
the top in anything that he does. Hence, it is no surprise that he’s risen to the highest position
in his field that he can, that of being on the Supreme Court.

However, the challenges in his name indicate that he can be highly intimidating to others and has a mean
streak. He might call his mean streak something else, and not consider it mean at all, yet the
ones around him may identify his mean streak once it was aimed in their direction. He can say
what needs to be said to manipulate the situation in his direction and create the illusion that is
desired . For example, he can say we don’t want to do XYZ to happen so we’re going to do ABC.
Yet, for the listeners who aren’t thinking when hearing what is being said, they may not realize
that ABC causes XYZ. Then, after ABC happens, he can swoop in and save the day as he has the
answer to XYZ since he crafted the answer prior to implementing ABC so that he could be the
hero who solved the problem. Brett has it in his name that he is the ultimate politician.

Blasey-Ford’s name indicates that she had a troubled childhood where she didn’t appreciate her
parents and felt they never gave her enough. Said another way, she felt that she didn’t get her
needs met and would have blamed her parents for her perceived lack. Blasey-Ford’s name also
indicates that she tends to do things the hard way, that her need to be right supersedes her
need for friendships, and that she doesn’t know how to apologize, let alone admit it, when she
is wrong. Her name also indicates that she can be charming and charismatic to cover her need
to be in charge and in control. Lastly, her name also indicates that she believes rules are for
others and not for her; she doesn’t need to follow the same rules she’d impose on others.
When we analyze both names we see that neither party is innocent. Both took advantage of the
opportunity to advance their own agenda.

Why couldn’t Kavanaugh simply say, “I used to drink too much and I don’t remember groping anyone,
however, if I did, I am so sorry. Can we evaluate me on what I’ve done the past thirty-five years
with my stellar record, and not my schooling days when I was young and didn’t always make the
best choices?” Why did Blasey-Ford choose now to come forward when the FBI has already investigated
Kavanaugh six times and nothing was said. It’s not like this is the first time he’s been
investigated. Why did Kavanaugh explode when answering the Senate’s questions and totally lose
his cool? Is that behavior representative of what we want on our highest court? Someone who is
obviously partisan to one party and hence one way of thinking? Do we want our women being treated
loathing, without even showing Blasey-Ford common decency so that how she was treated
feels like being victimized all over again? Do both sides believe what they are exposing? Mostly.
Both would know that part of what they are saying isn’t factual and yet both would believe that
their demeanor will carry the day. It is a sad commentary on how both parties behaved, both
politically and individually. Plus, our president mocking Blasey-Ford just added insult to injury.
What is our country becoming? Isn’t it time that moderation and reason resumes instead of
subjecting our nation to this emotional irrationality?

The benefit to this entire situation is that society has now been made aware that innocent men
may be falsely accused; that victims of real sexual advances may not be believed, and that our
culture has a huge problem with unwanted sexual advances. What woman can honestly say
that she has never had to endure inappropriate sexual advances? This is also happening to
more men today than most are aware. This is uncannily similar to when Nicole Simpson was
killed, and O.J. Simpson was blamed, with the ensuing polarizing circus that followed, with the
only positive outcome being in bringing the topic of wife abuse to the surface. We may wish to
thank both Kavanaugh and Blasey-Ford for bringing sexual misconduct front and center for
today’s conversation. Let’s hope the conversation continues with better results than with the
Simpson trial as we can only heal issues that we are willing to see and then address.

Please Share With Your Friends....

Follow Sharón